Critical Reading and Response on the Article “Letting Go” Essay

In the word Letting Go that was being make in The New Yorker, Atul Gawande addresses the issues regarding to the current aesculapian c ar establishment that fails to couple the postulate of the patients with terminal disease. Gawande promontorys let out that the patients want to occur much(prenominal) than quality clock time with their family members and having several(prenominal) special last moments rather than es interpret to stay alive when they know that the chances be thin. Knowing the time to let go was one of the crucial p artwork of the art of dying which people nowadays has forgotten. Gawande argues that choosing the hospice anguish would nightimes be a come apart select for the terminally ill patients.He habits statistics such that the patients that choose hospice lives longer or than other patients and they tend to suffer littleer to oppose his line of work. Hospice charge tends to go with less pain discussion and foc commits on the needfully o f the patients. It increases the quality of sustenance of the patients during the last moments of their live. The patients family members ar less likely to suffer from notion when they hire chosen to go with the hospice take mainly because they nurture prepared themselves to fount the death of the patient when time has come.Gawandes argument is that the checkup help system nowadays fails to meet the needs of the patients. His argument is convincing because he appeals to the emotions of his lector through with(predicate) both his own and others experience and statistics.Gawande reels in his readers attention and interest through round of the real flavor experience in advance he educates them. That makes it easier for the readers to absorb what Gawande is seek to make unnecessary to his audience. In order to make it thus far more convincing, Gawande uses two extreme cases as a comparison to prove his blame that hospice care would be the better choice for terminally ill patients.He uses the point of the lucky guy-Dave Galloway who died at home, at peace, and meet by family contrast with the poor elderly lady-Lee Cox who was died due to cardiac apprehend and followed by a series of actions to mold her stake to live. They pullight-emitting diode off her c downhes and pump her chest, put a tube in her airway and forced oxygen into her lungs, and move to see if they could shock her heart back (Gawande 133). Such contrast comparison and beefed-up words that would impact the readers thoughts on how the serve well of death can vary through different circumstances. After that, he over again embraces the benefits of choosing hospice care rather than going to infirmary for intensive medical treatments.Other than that, Gawande uses look for statistics to support his argument. A study led by the Harvard researcher Nicholas Christakis found out that sixty-three share of doctors overestimated survival time and the average estimate was 530 percen t likewise high (Gawande 136). The statistics shows that how the medical system is flunk to help the patients to draw a bead on a reaching on how much time they distillery have in order to hand the things that they want in live earlier their last breath. Since the research was carried out indoors the well-known institution-Harvard University, readers tend to believe the statistics more and agree upon Gawandes view. By doing this, Gawande was toilsome to point out the flaw in our medical system so that his reader would be agreeing upon his argument.Gawande also uses different statistics to support his argument. Executives at Aetna, the insurance company, started a biyearly study on letting a group of policyholders with a life antepast of less than a year to realise hospice advantages without forgoing other treatments. The essence is that the people that have chosen hospice service leaped from 26 percent to 70 percent (Gawande 142). The result shows that people were visi ting the hospital lesser later on they were introduced to hospice care. Gawande was arduous to use the statistics to tell the readers that there were a lot of people that was in the same role as they are, and they have chosen hospice care over hospital treatment after trying it. That implies that the hospice care would benefit the patients more than the hospital would.The overall structure of the Gawandes article was well organized. He was open to convince his readers by giving a main idea of what he is trying to deliver through stories and then prolong by some straight-forward points that he made. He then supports his arguments with examples to further enhance his point. The language that he uses is simple yet it gives the readers some images that connect with their emotion. For example, Sara would always arrive smiling, organisation on and bangs bobby-pinned out of her eyes. Shed distinguish small things to laugh about, like the tubes that created inappropriate protuberan ce under her dress (Gawande 137). Gawande was trying to show that how sad it could be when a person is going through those mathematical operation and treatment in order to get fixed. He would then use that emotion to bring up the point that is other solution to this problem which is the hospice care.I do think that the current medical care system doesnt meet the needs of the patients as there are some miscommunications between doctors and their patients. Doctors were always spirit at the bright side of the illness of their patients which is good in some good sense barely at the same time, they have to prepare the patients for their worst case scenario. It is great(p) for the patients to accept the right that their illness were beyond repair and doctors educate them to accept the truth so that they could go through a less torturing path for their unmixed life.So, what I am trying to say is that we shouldnt lose hope but at the same time we have to prepare our self for the wors t outcome. If prolonging the patients life means that they have to suffer from surgeries and treatment that they need until the end of their life, why not just do things that are more meaningful? Despite all the flaws that we had in our current medical care system, hospice care seems to be the solution for the problem because it offers sympathiser and satisfaction in the ending life of the patients.